Guerdon Associates continually analyses Long Term Incentive (LTI) vesting outcomes to determine the likelihood that an executive LTI will vest.
Our research and analysis examined the vesting outcomes for LTI plans with performance periods ending between FY17 and FY19 for the current ASX 200 (see article from last month HERE).
This article will focus on performance measures based on total shareholder return (TSR) and the differences in outcomes between absolute and relative TSR hurdles.
Of all the ASX 200 LTI plans that vested between FY17-FY19 (inclusive of market and non-market hurdles), 75% had relative TSR hurdles while 13% had absolute TSR hurdles. There is a strong bias towards relative TSR, reflecting the preferences of many investors and an influential proxy adviser, perhaps in the mistaken belief that such measures are objective and less likely to be gamed (see HERE).
TSR hurdles remain a top choice in the ASX 200. Of all ASX 200 company plans with market-based hurdles (i.e. where there is a reference to share price), 91% of these incorporate relative TSR as one of the measures.
Table 1 displays the vesting outcomes for FY17-FY19, split by relative TSR and absolute TSR measures.
Table 1: ASX 200 vesting results for TSR measures
The average vesting outcome for relative TSR and absolute TSR were 51% and 66% of maximum, respectively, and the median vesting outcome was 55% for both measures.
Absolute TSR hurdles resulted in more frequent vesting than relative TSR hurdles, as evidenced by 50% of an absolute TSR grant vesting at the 25th percentile of the sample compared to 0% vesting at the 25th percentile of the sample for relative TSR.
The charts below display relative TSR and absolute TSR vesting outcomes over the three-year period.
Figure 1: ASX 200 Relative TSR vesting over time
The average vesting outcomes for relative TSR were relatively flat over the three-year period. Median vesting outcomes were more volatile, ranging between 51% to 63% of maximum.
Figure 2: ASX 200 Absolute TSR vesting over time
Similar to the vesting outcomes for relative TSR, the average vesting outcome for absolute TSR was relatively flat over the three-year period and median outcomes were more volatile with vesting between 50% to 85% of maximum.
Some boards consider replacing LTI arrangements with fixed equity grants that vest on the basis of time only. The discount that should be applied to the face value of an LTI grant with TSR measures can be informed by this analysis of historical vesting outcomes, and the view of some investors and proxy advisers that the discount should be greater than 50% is not supported by evidence.© Guerdon Associates 2022 Back to all articles